it is for and from a beginner. hopefully, everyone who interested can understand. Physics is about concept, mathematics follows naturally.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Changing of frame II
this one is good~
Isospin
This is another degree of freedom or dimension in particle. The proton and neutron mass are very similar. And beside of the mass, and electric charge, proton and neutron are the same in everyway. Thus, it was portuslated that they are same particle and the different of mass is due to the electronmagnetic field. Which is like the Zeeman splitting of energy level on spin.
And also, the proton-neutron interaction is same as neutron neutron interaction in most cases. Thus it strongly suggest proton and neutron are same particle under strong interaction.
Without an magnetic field. Energy level of different spin are degenerated. And same thing happen on isospin : when there is no charge, no electric field, the energy level of isospin will be the same. So, proton and neutron will be the same particle when there is no field. And the strong force does not charge sensitive, thus, under the strong force, proton and neutron are the same.
spin and isospin share same mathematic description.
a magnetic moment, it can be come from spin angular momentum or orbital angular momentum, whic is current distribution.
The electric moment can be generated by isospin and electric charge distribution.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
a review on atomic structure
this one is half finish, sorry.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Rotation operator on x, y in Matrix form
Saturday, January 29, 2011
detail treatment on Larmor Precession and Rabi Resonance
is a pdf files, 15 pages. i think it covered most material on this subject. did i?
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Announcement
since there can edit formula.
Google sucks, this time!! too bad. i am a big fan of you!
http://nukephysik101.wordpress.com/
Parity
Parity is just a reflection on every space dimension.
X -> -X
Y -> -Y
Z -> - Z
This is just a mirror reflection, although it only reflects on 1 dimension, the dimension that perpendicular to the mirror surface.
The parity transform is taking everything reverted. For example, when you stand up, your arms place horizontal and you left arm points forward and your right arm points right. After a parity transform. You right arm point left. Your left arm point backward, and you are standing on the ceiling, upside down. The result is a mirror image of your self. If we rotate the reverted-self from the ceiling to the ground.
Thus, parity also related as mirror reflection. In physics, we like to call the right-hand system (RHS) or left-hand system (LHS).
A simple RHS and LHS are on your hands! Although our left hand and right hand has some minor different, in general, they are the mirror image of each other. And the great interesting thing is, your left hand cannot overlap the right hand. They are equal but not the same.
Another thing is spring, when a wire is rowed clockwise and going upward, it form a left-hand spring and vice aver. Thus 2 springs are not the same.
A more physical example is the polarization of light, there are lefthand rotating light and right hand rotating light, called circular polarization. And material which interact differenty with different circular polarization are called chiral material. We should stop talking about examples in here. Because in nature, there are so many things has chiral property. Never the less, potenient and drug also has chirality. One book I recommend on general science for the chirality is "right-hand, left-hand" by chris McManus.
Physics encounters parity is because we believe if the whole world is reverted, every thing just work fine and the same. For example, if our orgasms are all reflected, left goes to right, right go to left. We still alive. In fact, there are some real cases, that some peole do have reverted orgasm. Because there should be symmetric in the world.
For those which keep function as before parity transform, we called it parity positive, for those who are not, we called it parity negative.
Be reminded that the chiral material that interact circularly polarized light different still the parity positive. For example, a material which only let right hand light passes through, but not let the left hand pass. After parity transform, it lets left hand light pass through but not right hand .Thus, the left hand and right hand are work equally well!
We also cannot say our left hand is more weak then our right hand, then we called it parity negative. It is because, if we reflected ourself, our left hand is as good and right hand and the right hand is as weak as left hand.
In normal day, parity positive never break. It is seem impossible to break. How coome some thing work differently under parity transform?
However, in mathematics, there are many parity negative things. One example is the spherical harmonic. It is can be parity positive and negative depends on the parameter.
Lets take a imaginary example in parity negative. If we use photon to hit a target, all photons are going left. Now, we reflet the whole system. But now, the photons are still going left.
The first discovery of parity negative is on beta- decay from Co-60. Whe. Applied an external magnetic field from down to up, the beta particle come out at left. When we change the magnetic field, now is from up to down, the beta particle should come out at right, if parity is positive. But it is not, it still keep coming out left!
The reason of t is beyond my understanding... Sorry.
on Relaxation in NMR
instead of consider a single spin, we have to consider the ensemble. and an ensemble is describe by the density matrix.
the reason for not consider a single spin state is, we don’t know what is going on for individual spin. in fact, in the previous section, the magnetization is a Marco effect. a single spin cannot have so many states, it can only have 2 states - up or down. if we insist the above calculation is on one spin, thus, it only give the chance for having that direction of polarization. which, is from many measurements.
so, for a single spin, the spin can only have 2 states. and if the transverse B field frequency is not equal to the Larmor frequency , and the pule is not a pi-pulse, the spin has chance to go to the other state, which probability is given by a formula. and when it goes to relax back to the minimum energy state, it will emit a photon. but when it happen, we don’t know, it is a complete random process.
However, an ensemble, a collection of spins, we can have some statistic on it. for example, the relaxation time, T1 and T2.
NMR
The principle of NMR is simple.
- apply a B-field, and the spin will align with it due to interaction with surrounding and precessing along the B-field with Larmor frequency. the time for the spin align with the field is call T1, longitudinal relaxation time.
- Then, we send a pule perpendicular to the B-field, it usually a radio frequency pulse. the frequency is determined by the resonance frequency, which is same as the Larmor frequency. the function of this pulse is from the B-field of it and this perpendicular B-field with perturb the spin and flip it 90 degrees.
- when the spin are rotate at 90 degrees with the static B-field, it will generate a strong enough signal around the coil. ( which is the same coil to generate the pule ) and this signal is called NMR signal.
- since the spins are not isolate, when it interact with environment, they will go back and align with the static B-field. the time for this is called T2, transverse relaxation time.
by analyzing the T1 and T2 and also Larmor frequency, we can known the spin, the magnetization, the structure of the sample, the chemical element, the chemical formula, and alot many others thing by different kinds of techniques.
For nuclear physics, the use of NMR is for understand the nuclear spin. for example, the polarization of the spin.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Changing of frame
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
On mass deficit
But, why there are potential?
Coz there is a force associate with a potential.
Or in more correct way, the potential energy is due to the force. When 2 bodies in space has a attractive force, then it naturally go together. And the force accelerate the body and increase their kinetic energy.
Thus, we think the force created a field, which stored potential energy. When the force accelerates body, the potential energy converted into kinetic energy.
Imagine there are 2 bodies, A & B, Which at different location and have different force. If A is further away, when it comes at B, it has more kinetic energy than B, coz B is at rest at that position. Thus, further away, higher the potential.
Can thus potential be as high as infinite? In reality, because thing has surface, has size. The minimum distance between the 2 bodies is the sum of their radius. And if we sum up all potential, from the surface to infinity. We found that it is finite. And we like to set the potential at infinity is zero. Thus, it makes all attractive force has negative potential.
But, electric and positron do not has size, so, and electron and a positron can come together and the potential energy they can release is infinite! Since when they are apart infinite and the attractive force accelerate it, when they meet, their speed will be infinite!
Wait! The speed cannot be infinite, the highest speed is the speed of light and for an object has mass, it never move at the speed of light!
So, when electron and positron hit each other from infinity. However, relativity does not limit the energy and the kinetic energy. The result is, it can release infinite energy.
But at first, infinite exist. In reality, we can just approximate the "infinite" by far far away. When the potential change very little. But far far away is still very short compare to infinite. Thus, we don't have infinite energy source.
In laboratory, we can accelerate electron and position at very high speed and contain several GeV. Thus when those particles annihilate, they release GeV energy due to the kinetic energy and their mass, which is just 0.000511GeV. Does not help much.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Mass of particles and nucleus
Mass( electron ) = 9.11 × 10-31 kilograms
Mass( proton ) = 1.67 × 10-27 kilograms
see? as the special relativity give us a translation tool - E = m c^2, thus, we can use MeV to talk about mass.
Mass ( electron ) = 0.511 MeV
Mass ( proton ) = 938.3 MeV
thus, we can see, Proton is roughtly 2000 times heavier then electron ( 1000 : 0.5 ).
Mass( neutron ) = 939.6 MeV
neutron is just 1.3 MeV heavier then proton.
The nucleus is formed by proton and neutron. so, in simple thought, an nucleus with Z proton and ( A-Z ) neutron should have mass
Z x Mass( proton ) + ( A - Z ) x Mass ( neutron ) = Mass ( A, Z )
where A is the atomic mass number, which is equal the number of nucleons in the nucleus, and Z is the proton number.
However, scientists found that it is not true.
Z x Mass( proton ) + ( A - Z ) x Mass ( neutron ) > Mass ( A, Z )
Some of the mass is missing! But that is explained why nucleus will not break down automatically. since it need extra energy to break it down.
we called the mass different is Mass Deficit. or Blinding energy.
Mass Deficit = Mass( A, Z) - Mass ( proton + neutron )
some one may think that the blinding energy is the energy for holding the nucleus together. in order to hold the nucleus, some mass was converted into the energy to holding it. this is INCORRECT. the correct argument is, the blinding energy is th energy require to break it down.
think about a simple 2 bodies system, like sun and earth. at far far away, when both of them are at rest, the total energy is Mass( sun) + Mass ( earth ) + Potential energy.
when the earth moves toward to sun, the potential energy converted to the Kinetic energy, so the earth moving faster and faster. but, in order to stay in the orbit, some K.E. must be lost so that it does not have enough ( or the same) energy to run away. Thus, the total energy of the system is lesser then the total mass.
another analogy is electron orbit. when an electron was captured by an atom, it radiate energy in order to stay in some energy level. thus, the total energy of the system again less then the total mass.
any any case, the mass of the sun and earth and electron does not change, but the potential changes to negative, thus it makes to total energy lesser.
similar idea hold for nucleus, but the potential of it are great different, because there are a Coulomb Barrier. Thus, in order to make a nucleus. we have to put so many K.E. to again this barrier, then the resultant nucleus release the Mass Deficit energy and also the input K.E..
a scratch on the nuclear potential. there are a Coulomb Barrie. ( by wolframalpha.com) |
Larmor Procession
this is a magnet by angular momentum of charge or spin. its value is:
mu = gamma S ( in case of spin ) = gamma L ( in case of angular momentum )
where gamma is (g-factor) x ( Bohr magneton ) / ( h_bar [ in case that the S or L is not using natural unit ] )
the g-factor is a dimensionless number, which reflect the environment of the spin, for orbital angular momentum, g = 1.
Bohr magneton = electron charge x h_bar / ( 2 mass), since different particle has different mass, their Bohr magneton value are different. electron is the lightest particle, so, it has largest value on Bohr magneton.
J-coupling ( i am not sure it is correct to say so)
since the spin and angular momentum are mathematical equal. they give the same effect when react with magnetic field, thus, we use a new term:
J = L + S
mu = gamma J
in this case, since the g-factor of L and S are different, and when we combine with different particles, the Bohr magnetons are different, in that case, special treatment is needed. but it does not change the principle.
Larmor frequency:
When applied a magnetic field on a magnetic moment, the field will cause the moment process around the axis of the field. the precession frequency is called Larmor frequency.
the procession can be understood in classical way or QM way.
Classical way:
the change of angular momentum is equal to the applied torque. and the torque is equal to the magnetic moment cross product with the magnetic field.
d J / d t = mu x B = gamma J x B
solving gives the procession frequency is :
w = - gamma B
the minus sign is very important, it indicated that the J is precessing by left hand rule.
QM way:
The Schrödinger equation is :
i d/dt |Psi > = H |Psi >
H is the Hamiltonian = - mu . B = - gamma J.B = - gamma B Jz = w Jz
Jz is an operator.
the solution is for |Psi> is
|Psi ( t ) > = Exp[ - i w Jz ] |Psi ( t = 0 ) >
for up state coefficient a1 and down state coefficient a2,
solving a1 and a2 gives:
a1 = Exp [ - i w t ]
a2 = Exp [ + i w t ]
Thus, in QM point of view, the state does not change but only the phase.
For not using natural unit, we knew, w h_bar = Energy.
Natural unit
now, we impose 1 more things, the Reduced Planck constant, h_bar also set to 1. that simplify all equations with angular momentum or spin.
the Angular momentum:
L^2 | l, m > = h_bar l ( l+1) |l, m >
Lz |l, m > = h_bar m |l, m >
now becomes :
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Spin
Spin is a intrinsics property of elementary particle, such as electron, proton, and even photon. Intrinsics means it is a built-in property, like mass, charge. Which extrinsic properties are speed, momentum.
Spin is a vector or tensor quality while charge and mass are scaler.
Spin can react with magnetic field, like charge reacts with electric field or mass react with force produce acceleration. Thus, spin is like a bar-magnet inside particle, counter part of charge.
The magnitude of spin is half integer or integer of reduced Planck's constant h_bar or hb. Particles with half integer of spin are classified as Fermion, and those with integer spin are Boson. they follow different statistic while interact together, thus, this creates different physics for different group.
we are not going to the mathematic description this time.
the effect of spin causes the magnetic moment, that's why it react with magnetic field. the other thing that creates magnetic moment is angular momentum for charge particle, like electron orbiting around nucleus. So, both spin and angular momentum can be imagined as a little magnet, thus, they can interact, in physics, we call the interaction between spin and angular momentum is coupling. for example, spin-orbital coupling, spin-spin coupling, etc..
when the spin interact with external magnetic field, it will process around the magnetic field with Larmor frequency. and the direction of the spin while undergoes procession can only be certain angle. for spin half, like electron or proton. there are only 2 directions, and we called it up and down.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Hall effect
The hall probe is perpendicular to the B field( pointing up) and have a current I passing through ( going forward ).
Due to the Lorentz force. The positron is moving to right and accumulate. The accumulating charge creates a electric force to the left to against further positron accumulate. The magnetic force will be balanced by the electric force. Due to the electric force, there is associated voltage across the hall probe. This voltage is called hall voltage.
FB= e v B = Vh d
Where e is positron charge, v is speed of positron, B is the magnetic field, Vh is the Hall voltage and d is the distance across the hall probe.
The current I is
I = A n e v
Where A is the cross section area of the hall probe, n is density of the positron carrier, v is the positron velocity.
Thus,
Vh = I B / ( V n e )
Where V is the volume of the hall probe. But the V n is equal to the total number of positron N.
Vh = I B / ( N e )
Which is to say, the hall voltage is proportional to the magnetic field.
decay time constant and line width
the reason for the line width is, this is decay.
i give 2 explanations, once is from classical point of view and i skipped the explanation for the imaginary part. so, i am not fully understand. the 2nd explanation is look better, but it is from QM. however, there is one hide question for that explanation is, why the imaginary energy is negative?
the simplest understanding of the relation is using fourier transform. (i think)
fourier transform is changing the time-frame into the frequency frame. i.e, i have a wave, propagating with frequency w. we can see a wave shape when plot with time. and we only see a line, when we plot with frequency, since there is only 1 single frequency. however, for a general wave, it is composite of many different frequencies, using fourier transform can tell us which frequency are involved. And energy is proportional to frequency.
when the particle or state under decay. the function is like
Exp[- R t] Exp[ i wo t]
where the R is decay constant, and wo is the wave frequency.
after fourier transform, assume there is nothing for t < 0
1/ ( R + i ( wo - w) )
the real part is
R/ ( R^2 + (w - wo)^2 )
which is a Lorentzian shape and have Full-Width-Half-Maximum (FWHM) is 2R. it comes from the cosine part of the fourier transform. thus, the real part.
and the imaginary part is
(w - wo)/( R^2 + (w - wo)^2 )
the imaginary part is corresponding to the since part, so, we can neglect it. (how exactly why we can neglect it? )
Thus, we can see, if there is no decay, R -> 0, thus, there is no line width.
therefore, we can see the line width in atomic transition, say, 2p to 1s. but there are many other mechanism to the line width, like Doppler broadening, or power broadening. So, Decay will product line width, but not every line width is from decay.
**********************************
another view of this relation is from the quantum mechanics.
the solution of Schroedinger equation is
Psi [x, t ] = phi[x] Exp[- i E/hbar t]
so, the probability conserved with time, i.e.:
| Psi [x,t] |^2 = | Psi[x,0] | ^2
if we assume the energy has small imaginary part
E = E0 - i R hbar/2 ( why the imaginary energy is nagative?)
| Psi [x,t] |^2 = | Psi[x,0] | ^2 Exp[- R t]
that make the wavefunction be :
Psi [x, t ] = phi[x] Exp[- i E/hbar t] Exp[ - R/2 t ]
what is the meaning of the imaginary energy?
the wave function is on time-domain, but what is "physical", or observable is in Energy -domain. so, we want Psi[x,E] rather then Psi[x,t], the way to do the transform is by fourier transform.
and after the transform, the probability of finding particle at energy E is given by
|Psi[x,E]|^2 = Constant / ( R^2 + ( wo - w)^2 )
which give out the line width in energy.
and the relation between the FWHM(line width) and the decay time is
mean life time = hbar / FWHM
which once again verify the uncertainty principle.
WKB approximation
i just copy what written in Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David Griffiths (1995) Chapter 8.
The approx. can be applied when the potential is varies slowly compare the wavelength of the wave function. when it expressed in Exp[ i k x], wavelength = 2 pi / k, when it expressed in Exp[ - kapper x ], wavelength = 1/kapper.
in general, the wavefunction can be expressed as amplitude and phase:
A[x] Exp[ i phase[x] ], A[x] and phase[x] are real function.
sub this into the Schrödinger equation ( Psi ''[x] = - { 2 m / hb (E - V[x])} Psi[x] ). and separate the imaginary part and real part.
The imaginary part is can be simplified as:
D[ A^2 phase' ] = 0 => A = Const. /Sqrt[ phase'[x] ]
The real part is
A''[x] = ( phase'[x]^2 - 2 m / hb (E - V[x]) ) A[x]
we use the approx. that A''[x] = 0 since it varies slowly.
Thus,
phase'[x] = Sqrt[2 m / hb (E - V[x])]
=>
phase[x] = Integrate[ Sqrt[2 m / hb (E - V[x])], x]
and the solution is, ( if we use p[x] = Sqrt[2 m / hb (E - V[x])] )
Psi [x] = Const. /Sqrt[ p[x] ] Exp[ i Integrate[ p[x] ] ]
Simple! but one thing should keep in mind that, the WKB approx is not OK when Energy = potential.
This tell you, the phase part of the wave function is equal the square of the area of the different of Energy and the Potential.
when the energy is smaller then the potential, than, the wavefunction is under decay.
one direct application of WKB approxi is on the Tunneling effect.
if the potential is large enough, so, the transmittance is dominated by the decay, Thus, the probability of the tunneling is equal to Exp[- 2 Sqrt[ 2m / hb] Sqrt[area between V[x] and Energy] ]. Therefore, when we have an ugly potential, we can approx it by a rectangular potential with same area to give the similar estimation.
alpha decay
i assume we know what is alpha decay, which is a process that bring excited nucleus to lower energy state by emitting an alpha particle.
The force govern this process is the strong force, due to the force is so strong, the interaction time is very short, base on the uncertainty principle that large change in energy leads to short time interval. however, the observed alpha decay constant is about 1.3 × 1010 year, which is about the age of our universe. That's why we still able to find it at the beginning of nuclear physics : discovery of radioactive matter.
The reason for such a long decay time is due to the Coulomb barrier of the nuclear potential. since the proton carry positive charge, thus. it creates a positive potential wall in the nucleus. that potential not only repulse proton from outside but also the proton from inside which try to get out. thus, the inside protons are bounded back and forth inside the nucleus. due to the momentum carried by the protons, it has frequency 6 × 1021 per sec.
Due to the Quantum tunneling effect, the probability of tunneling is 4 × 10-40. which is a very small chance. But , don't forget there are 6 × 1021 trails per sec. Thus, the chance per sec is 2.4 × 10-18 . and the mean life time is inverse of the probability, thus it is approx 1.3 × 1010 year.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
terminology
Nucleus : (noun) is the core of element, which contain protons and neutrons
Nuclei : (noun) many of nucleus
Nuclear : (adj) to relate something to nucleus. e.g. nuclear energy, nuclear plant, nuclear phsyics
Nucleon: (noun) is the thing make the nucleus, which is a single word. a nucleon can be a proton or neutron
Nuclide: ( noun) [from google translate : A distinct kind of atom or nucleus characterized by a specific number of protons and neutrons ] (what??)
Detector
there are 3 main principles on particle detection.
- by the ionization between particle and gas
- by the excitation of energy level
- by the detection of photon
here is a diagram from WIKI, which summarized
on the sum of 4 momentum and excited mass
P_i = ( E_i , p_i )
we use the c = 1 unit as usual.
to find out the mass before the decay, we can use
Sqrt[ Sum[E_i]^2 - Sum[p_i]^2 ] = excited mass.
the reason for the term "excited mass", we can see by the following illustration.
consider a head on collision of 2 particles in C.M. frame, with momentum p and energy E1 and E2.
the mass for each one is given by
m1=Sqrt[ E1^2 - p^2 ]
m2=Sqrt[ E2^2 - p^2 ]
but if we use the sum of the 4 momentum and calculate the mass,
Sqrt[ (E1+E2) ^2 - (p - p)^2 ] = E1 + E2
which is not equal to Sqrt[ E1^2 - p^2 ] + Sqrt[ E2^2 - p^2 ]
in fact, it is larger.
the reason for its larger is, when using the sum of 4 momentum, we actually assumed the produce of collision is just 1 particles, and the collision is inelastic. Thus, if we think about the time-reverse process, which is a decay, thus, some of the mass will convert to K.E. for the decay product.
Friday, January 14, 2011
Type of accelerator (Ring type)
- the particle circulate inside the accelerator, so, it can be accelerate infinite time in principle.
- The space require is smaller compare with similar energy output Linac.
- particle can have every high energy
- high intensity of beam
- it can have some section only for linear motion with accelerate.
- it is not limited by the B field. since the narrow of the beam, a higher forcing B field can be applied.
particles identification
there are 3 main principles in PID.
- decay mood
- time of flight
- energy loss to surrounding
Monday, January 10, 2011
Scattering phase shift
Sum { a[ l ] Y[ l, m = 0] R[ l , k , r] }
the m=0 is because the spherical symmetry. the R is the radial part of the wave function. and a is a constant. k is the linear momentum and r is the radial distance.
for free particle, potential equal to zero,
R -> J[ l , k r]
which is reasonable when r is infinite and the nuclear potential is very short distance. when r goes to infinity,
J[ l, k r ] -> 1/ (k r ) Sin{ k r - 1/2 l pi}
for elastic scattering, the probability of the current density is conserved in each angular wave function, thus,
the effect of the nuclear potential can only change the phase inside the sin function:
1/ (k r ) Sin{ k r - 1/2 l pi + d[ l ]}
with further treatment, the total cross section is proportional to Sin{ d[ l ] }^2.
thus, by knowing the scattering phase shift, we can know the properties of the nuclear potential.
for more detail : check this website
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Informations we can extract
- the number of particles counted at particular solid angle. ( when you have a unit sphere, the area on the surface is called solid angle)
- The polarization (spin)
- charge
- energy
- momentum (time of flight)
magic number
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Slide rule
moved to : http://gucciproxy.blogspot.com/2011/01/slide-rule.html
and http://gucciproxy.blogspot.com/2011/01/slide-rule-2.html